Current:Home > ContactAmazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa -FinanceAcademy
Amazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa
View
Date:2025-04-18 10:31:58
Amazon will pay more than $30 million in fines to settle alleged privacy violations involving its voice assistant Alexa and doorbell camera Ring, according to federal filings.
In one lawsuit, the Federal Trade Commission claims the tech company violated privacy laws by keeping recordings of children's conversations with its voice assistant Alexa, and in another that its employees have monitored customers' Ring camera recordings without their consent.
The FTC alleges Amazon held onto children's voice and geolocation data indefinitely, illegally used it to improve its algorithm and kept transcripts of their interactions with Alexa despite parents' requests to delete them.
The alleged practices would violate the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA, which requires online companies to alert and obtain consent from parents when they gather data for children under age 13 and allow parents to delete the data at will.
In addition to the $25 million civil penalty, Amazon would not be able to use data that has been requested to be deleted. The company also would have to remove children's inactive Alexa accounts and be required to notify its customers about the FTC's actions against the company.
"Amazon's history of misleading parents, keeping children's recordings indefinitely, and flouting parents' deletion requests violated COPPA and sacrificed privacy for profits," said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a statement. "COPPA does not allow companies to keep children's data forever for any reason, and certainly not to train their algorithms."
Until September 2019, Alexa's default settings were to store recordings and transcripts indefinitely. Amazon said it uses the recordings to better understand speech patterns and respond to voice commands, the complaint says.
After the FTC intervened at the time, Amazon added a setting to automatically delete data after three or 18 months, but still kept the indefinite setting as the default.
Amazon said in a statement it disagrees with the FTC's findings and does not believe it violated any laws.
"We take our responsibilities to our customers and their families very seriously," it said. "We have consistently taken steps to protect customer privacy by providing clear privacy disclosures and customer controls, conducting ongoing audits and process improvements, and maintaining strict internal controls to protect customer data."
The company said it requires parental consent for all children's profiles, provides a Children's Privacy Disclosure elaborating on how it uses children's data, allows child recordings and transcripts to be deleted in the Alexa app and erases child profiles that have been inactive for at least 18 months.
More than 800,000 children under age 13 have their own Alexa accounts, according to the complaint.
The FTC claims that when these issues were brought to Amazon's attention, it did not take action to remedy them.
In a separate lawsuit, the FTC seeks a $5.8 million fine for Amazon over claims employees and contractors at Ring — a home surveillance company Amazon bought in 2018 — had full access to customers' videos.
Amazon is also accused of not taking its security protections seriously, as hackers were able to break into two-way video streams to sexually proposition people, call children racial slurs and physically threaten families for ransom.
Despite this, the FTC says, Ring did not implement multi-factor authentication until 2019.
In addition to paying the $5.8 million, which will be issued as customer refunds, Ring would have to delete customers' videos and faces from before 2018, notify customers about the FTC's actions and report any unauthorized access to videos to the FTC.
"Ring's disregard for privacy and security exposed consumers to spying and harassment," Levine said. "The FTC's order makes clear that putting profit over privacy doesn't pay."
The proposed orders require approval from federal judges.
veryGood! (5584)
Related
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- 'Heretic' star Hugh Grant talks his 'evil freaks' era and 'Bridget Jones' return
- Wyoming moves ahead with selling land in Grand Teton National Park to federal government for $100M
- Florida awards Billy Napier a flimsy vote of confidence, as Gators crumble under his watch
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- When was Mike Tyson's first fight? What to know about legend's start in boxing
- After Trump Win, World Says ‘We’ve Been Here Before’
- Roland Quisenberry’s Investment Journey: From Market Prodigy to AI Pioneer
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Lock in a mortgage rate after the Fed cuts? This might be your last chance
Ranking
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- AI DataMind: Quantitative Investment Journey of Dexter Quisenberry
- 40 monkeys escape from Alpha Genesis research facility in South Carolina
- After Trump Win, World Says ‘We’ve Been Here Before’
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Police Search Underway After 40 Monkeys Escape Facility in South Carolina
- Roland Quisenberry: The Visionary Architect Leading WH Alliance into the Future
- Halle Bailey Seemingly Calls Out Ex DDG Over Parenting Baby Halo
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Can legislation combat the surge of non-consensual deepfake porn? | The Excerpt
NYC parents charged in death of 4-year-old boy who prosecutors say was starved to death
Halle Bailey criticizes ex DDG for showing their son on livestream
Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
Sister Wives' Janelle Brown Details First Marriage to Meri Brown's Brother
Jewish students attacked at DePaul University in Chicago while showing support for Israel
Average rate on a 30-year mortgage in the US rises for 6th straight week