Current:Home > MyMassachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy" -FinanceAcademy
Massachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy"
View
Date:2025-04-12 23:03:21
So-called legacy college admissions — or giving preference to the children of alumni — is coming under new scrutiny following the Supreme Court's ruling last week that scraps the use of affirmative action to pick incoming students.
Lawmakers in Massachusetts are proposing a new fee that would be levied on the state's colleges and universities that use legacy preferences when admitting students, including Harvard University and Williams College, a highly ranked small liberal arts college. Any money raised by the fee would then be used to fund community colleges within the state.
The proposed law comes as a civil rights group earlier this month sued Harvard over legacy admissions at the Ivy League school, alleging the practice discriminates against students of color by giving an unfair advantage to the mostly White children of alumni. Harvard and Williams declined to comment on the proposed legislation.
Highly ranked schools such as Harvard have long relied on admissions strategies that, while legal, are increasingly sparking criticism for giving a leg up to mostly White, wealthy students. Legacy students, the children of faculty and staff, recruited athletes and kids of wealthy donors represented 43% of the White students admitted to Harvard, a 2019 study found.
"Legacy preference, donor preference and binding decision amount to affirmative action for the wealthy," Massachusetts Rep. Simon Cataldo, one of the bill's co-sponsors, told CBS MoneyWatch.
The Massachusetts lawmakers would also fine colleges that rely on another strategy often criticized as providing an unfair advantage to students from affluent backgrounds: early-decision applications, or when students apply to a school before the general admissions round.
Early decision usually has a higher acceptance rate than the general admissions pool, but it typically draws wealthier applicants
because early applicants may not know how much financial aid they could receive before having to decide on whether to attend.
Because Ivy League colleges now routinely cost almost $90,000 a year, it's generally the children of the very rich who can afford to apply for early decision.
"At highly selective schools, the effect of these policies is to elevate the admissions chances of wealthy students above higher-achieving students who don't qualify as a legacy or donor prospect, or who need to compare financial aid packages before committing to a school," Cataldo said.
$100 million from Harvard
The proposed fee as part of the bill would be levied on the endowments of colleges and universities that rely on such strategies. Cataldo estimated that the law would generate over $120 million in Massachusetts each year, with $100 million of that stemming from Harvard.
That's because Harvard has a massive endowment of $50.9 billion, making it one of the nation's wealthiest institutions of higher education. In 2020, the university had the largest endowment in the U.S., followed by Yale and the University of Texas college system, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.
Not all colleges allow legacy admissions. Some institutions have foresworn the practice, including another Massachusetts institution, MIT. The tech-focused school also doesn't use binding early decision.
"Just to be clear: we don't do legacy," MIT said in an admissions blog post that it points to as explaining its philosophy. "[W]e simply don't care if your parents (or aunt, or grandfather, or third cousin) went to MIT."
It added, "So to be clear: if you got into MIT, it's because you got into MIT. Simple as that."
"Good actors" in higher education, like MIT, wouldn't be impacted by the proposed fee, Cataldo noted.
- In:
- College
veryGood! (678)
Related
- Small twin
- How to watch surprise 5th episode of 'Quiet on Set' featuring Drake Bell and other stars
- Kentucky House passes bill to have more teens tried in adult courts for gun offenses
- How to watch surprise 5th episode of 'Quiet on Set' featuring Drake Bell and other stars
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Fast wireless EV charging? It’s coming.
- Costco food court: If you aren't a member it may mean no more $1.50 hot dogs for you
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is expected to announce his VP pick for his independent White House bid
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Frantic text after Baltimore bridge collapse confirms crew OK: 'Yes sir, everyone is safe'
Ranking
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Here’s what we know about the allegations against Shohei Ohtani’s interpreter, Ippei Mizuhara
- Utah women's basketball team experienced 'racial hate crimes' during NCAA Tournament
- Fast wireless EV charging? It’s coming.
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Outrage over calls for Caitlin Clark, Iowa surest sign yet women's game has arrived
- U.N. Security Council passes resolution demanding immediate Hamas-Israel war cease-fire, release of hostages
- EU investigating Apple, Google and Meta's suspected violations of new Digital Markets Act
Recommendation
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
‘Heroes’ scrambled to stop traffic before Baltimore bridge collapsed; construction crew feared dead
Geoengineering Faces a Wave of Backlash Over Regulatory Gaps and Unknown Risks
Hold Tight to These Twilight Cast Reunion Photos, Spider Monkey
Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
MLB's five most pivotal players to watch for 2024
Oil and Gas Executives Blast ‘LNG Pause,’ Call Natural Gas a ‘Destination Fuel’
Elle Fanning Debuts Her Most Dramatic Hair Transformation Yet