Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -FinanceAcademy
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
TradeEdge Exchange View
Date:2025-04-11 04:39:27
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (686)
Related
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- Police broadcast message from escaped murderer's mother during manhunt, release new images of fugitive
- Summer House's Danielle Olivera Subtly Weighs in on Carl Radke & Lindsay Hubbard's Breakup
- Military funerals at risk in Colorado due to dwindling number of volunteers for ceremonies
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- The Beigie Awards: China Edition
- Seal thanks daughter Leni 'for making me a better person' in rare Instagram photo together
- Burning Man exodus operations begin as driving ban is lifted, organizers say
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- North Carolina’s transportation secretary is retiring; the chief operating officer will succeed him
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Dangerous riptides persist after series of Jersey Shore drownings, rescues
- Disney seeks to amend lawsuit against DeSantis to focus on free speech claim
- Suspect on the loose after brutally beating, sexually assaulting university student
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- What's the safest 2023 midsize sedan? Here's the take on Hyundai, Toyota and others
- Georgia football staff member Jarvis Jones arrested for speeding and reckless driving
- Chiefs’ All-Pro TE Travis Kelce hyperextends knee in practice for opener vs Detroit
Recommendation
Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
Congress returns to try to stave off a government shutdown while GOP weighs impeachment inquiry
First lady Jill Biden tests positive for COVID-19, but President Biden’s results negative so far
The Twitter Menswear Guy is still here, he doesn't know why either
North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
Here's why the US labor movement is so popular but union membership is dwindling.
Horoscopes Today, September 4, 2023
Alex Murdaugh's lawyers accuse court clerk of jury tampering and demand new trial