Current:Home > MarketsThe EPA says Americans could save $1 trillion on gas under its auto emissions plan -FinanceAcademy
The EPA says Americans could save $1 trillion on gas under its auto emissions plan
View
Date:2025-04-25 21:19:27
Americans could stand to save up to $1.1 trillion on gasoline prices should the Environmental Protection Agency's proposal to impose the toughest-ever auto emissions standards be adopted, the agency projected on Wednesday.
The projection was included in the 758-page report issued by the EPA detailing its proposed regulations, which include tailpipe emissions so stringent that it could lead to 67% of new vehicle sales being electric by 2032.
Such a big shift to electric cars could save Americans between $580 billion and $1.1 trillion on gasoline — even factoring in the extra money drivers would spend on electricity to juice up their vehicles.
The agency forecasts an additional $280 billion to $580 billion in savings on vehicle maintenance.
The EPA predicts that U.S. consumption and net imports of petroleum would both go down as a result. That would increase U.S. energy security, although as the EPA acknowledges, the U.S. is now also a major oil producer — in fact, the world's largest oil producer.
Trade groups representing U.S. oil and gas producers have joined a legal challenge against EPA's previous efforts to promote electric vehicles.
In legal filings, they wrote that their members would suffer "material adverse consequences" from a shift toward electric vehicles, which would also hurt the coffers of oil-producing states like Texas.
Multiple domestic oil groups declined NPR's requests for comment.
EPA also projects other big savings for car owners
EVs are cheaper to operate than conventional vehicles; the exact amount of savings depends on local gasoline and electricity prices. But they cost more up front.
And a similar pattern holds in the EPA's analysis. If the proposed standards are put in place, the EPA estimates every car sold in in 2032 will cost $1,200 more to manufacture than it would otherwise.
That price increase, however, would be canceled out by the savings on fuel, cost and maintenance, so that overall, an owner of a car or SUV would save $9,000 and the owner of an electric pickup truck would save $13,000, according to the EPA.
The switch to EVs could have benefits for broader society, too: fewer premature deaths from road pollution and reduced impacts of climate change. The transportation sector is the largest source of planet-warming emissions in the U.S., which is the world's biggest consumer of oil.
The change being envisioned here is big — really, really big.
"This reinvents the vehicle," says Michelle Krebs, executive analyst at Cox Automotive. "It reinvents how consumers interact with their vehicle. It reimagines the entire industrial base."
Thomas Boylan, the regulatory director at the Zero Emissions Transportation Association — a trade group representing companies along the EV supply chain, which stands to benefit from this transition — noted that the industry has a few years to prepare.
"The investments that are being made today, of which there are very many, ... they are going to bear fruit over the time period that these standards contemplate," he says. "I think there's going to be a very different world come 2027."
veryGood! (931)
Related
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- And Just Like That's Costume Designers Share the Only Style Rule they Follow
- Russia says Moscow and Crimea hit by Ukrainian drones while Russian forces bombard Ukraine’s south
- Inside Clean Energy: The Right and Wrong Lessons from the Texas Crisis
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Warming Trends: Americans’ Alarm Grows About Climate Change, a Plant-Based Diet Packs a Double Carbon Whammy, and Making Hay from Plastic India
- Kim Zolciak Teases Possible Reality TV Return Amid Nasty Kroy Biermann Divorce
- Does the 'Bold Glamour' filter push unrealistic beauty standards? TikTokkers think so
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Anger grows in Ukraine’s port city of Odesa after Russian bombardment hits beloved historic sites
Ranking
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Small plane crashes into Santa Fe home, killing at least 1
- Birmingham firefighter dies days after being shot while on duty
- Warming Trends: Radio From a Future Free of Fossil Fuels, Vegetarianism Not Hot on Social Media and Overheated Umpires Make Bad Calls
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Can India become the next high-tech hub?
- How Taylor Swift's Cruel Summer Became the Song of the Season 4 Years After Its Release
- Adele Pauses Concert to Survey Audience on Titanic Sub After Tragedy at Sea
Recommendation
Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
House escalates an already heated battle over federal government diversity initiatives
Rihanna Steps Down as CEO of Savage X Fenty, Takes on New Role
Boy, 10, suffers serious injuries after being thrown from Illinois carnival ride
Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
These Stars' First Jobs Are So Relatable (Well, Almost)
As a Senate Candidate, Mehmet Oz Supports Fracking. But as a Celebrity Doctor, He Raised Significant Concerns
Why we usually can't tell when a review is fake