Current:Home > ContactTokyo court only holds utility responsible to compensate Fukushima evacuees and reduces damages -FinanceAcademy
Tokyo court only holds utility responsible to compensate Fukushima evacuees and reduces damages
View
Date:2025-04-15 14:49:44
TOKYO (AP) — A Tokyo court on Tuesday held only the operator of the tsunami-wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant responsible for paying damages to dozens of evacuees.
The Tokyo High Court also slashed the amount to half of what the lower court had ordered and relieved the government of responsibility — a decision that plaintiffs and their lawyers criticized as belittling their suffering and the severity of the disaster.
The court ordered only the Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, known as TEPCO, to pay a total of 23.5 million yen ($165,000) to 44 of the 47 plaintiffs, while not holding the government accountable.
Tuesday’s ruling apparently backpedaled from an earlier decision in March 2018, when the Tokyo District Court held both the government and TEPCO accountable for the disaster, which the ruling said could have been prevented if they both took better precautionary measures, ordering both to pay 59 million yen ($414,400) in damages.
The decision comes at a time when Japan’s government tries to accelerate reactor restarts to maximize nuclear energy to meet decarbonization targets, while seeking to tone down the impact of the nuclear disaster 13 years ago, and its memory gradually fades.
Three reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant melted after a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami hit on March 11, 2011, releasing massive amounts of radiation in the area and displacing more than 160,000 people at one point. About 27,000 of them are still unable to return home.
The government has pushed for the decontamination of affected areas and the reopening of no-go zones, and has urged evacuees to return to their homes while cutting back support for them. The government-set compensation program, which is mostly based on distance from the plant and radiation levels, has triggered divisions and discrimination among communities.
The dispute centers on whether the government could have foreseen the risk of a massive tsunami, and whether the disaster could have been averted if the government had ordered the utility to take precautions.
In the ruling, judge Hiro Misumi said the flooding of the plant because of the tsunami wasn’t preventable even if the industry ministry used its authority and ordered the utility to enhance a seawall based on a tsunami estimate at that time.
The decision is among the four rulings that apparently came in line with the June 2022 Supreme Court decision that said the government wasn’t liable for the disaster and that the disaster from a tsunami that high wasn’t foreseeable or preventable.
Motomitsu Nakagawa, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said that Tuesday’s high court ruling was “almost a mere copy and paste” of the top court decision and that it “makes me infuriated.”
Nakagawa said the ruling takes the disaster-hit residents’ suffering lightly, and the reduction of the amount of compensation is also tantamount to saying that the operator can get away with paying only that much damage in a disaster.
He said that he planned to discuss a possible appeal to the Supreme Court after consulting with his clients.
Yuya Kamoshita, who has evacuated to Tokyo from Iwaki, south of the Fukushima Daiichi plant with his family, said the ruling was unacceptable because it trivialized the evacuees’ sufferings, and failed to hold the government accountable even though the nuclear power plant was operated as part of the national energy policy.
veryGood! (27985)
Related
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Dylan Mulvaney addresses backlash from Bud Light partnership in new video
- Climate Scientists Take Their Closest Look Yet at the Warming Impact of Aviation Emissions
- Overdose deaths from fentanyl combined with xylazine surge in some states, CDC reports
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Supreme Court blocks student loan forgiveness plan, dealing blow to Biden
- In ‘After Water’ Project, 12 Writers Imagine Life in Climate Change-Altered Chicago
- Anxiety Mounts Abroad About Climate Leadership and the Volatile U.S. Election
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick, now 92, not competent to stand trial in sex abuse case, expert says
Ranking
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Rumer Willis Recalls Breaking Her Own Water While Giving Birth to Baby Girl
- Supreme Court rejects affirmative action, ending use of race as factor in college admissions
- The Trump Administration Moves to Open Alaska’s Tongass National Forest to Logging
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Jonah Hill and Olivia Millar Step Out After Welcoming First Baby
- Fourth of July flight delays, cancellations contributing to summer travel woes
- The Ultimatum’s Xander Shares What’s Hard to Watch Back in Vanessa Relationship
Recommendation
Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
Read full text of the Supreme Court affirmative action decision and ruling in high-stakes case
Geothermal: Tax Breaks and the Google Startup Bringing Earth’s Heat into Homes
U.S. Mayors Pressure Congress on Carbon Pricing, Climate Lawsuits and a Green New Deal
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
This week on Sunday Morning (July 2)
What is the Higher Education Act —and could it still lead to student loan forgiveness?
19 Father's Day Gift Ideas for Your Husband That He'll Actually Love